Before a child says their first word, they begin to produce and practice sounds they hear. Early vocalizations play a crucial role in speech development and language acquisition. However, most research on infant vocalizations focuses on children in Western, industrialized societies. This study contributes to the growing body of literature on diverse linguistic environments, specifically examining emergent sounds in the Panãra community, an Indigenous group in the Brazilian Amazon with approximately 700 speakers. Ten infants aged 2-21 months wore recording devices that collected a recording of their language environment over a day. Alongside shared ethnographic observations, I manually annotated selected 30-second audio segments for a fine-grained analysis of child vocalizations. I am currently analyzing the frequency and types of child vocalizations (i.e. vocal play, canonical babbling, variegated babbling) in infants' speech, and I plan to explore how these vocalizations may differ across the age range studied. I predict that child vocalizations will become more complex with increasing age, following pre-speech vocal development stages broadly found across cultures. My findings will contribute to a broader understanding of how language learning varies across cultural settings, vocalization stages, and the role of the environment to language development. 

I am currently assisting PhD student Jessica Luo in her research of the Sanmen Wu sound system, a language of the Wu family found in Southeast China. As Jessica writes an article that summarizes the sound structure of Sanmen Wu, I analyze utterances produced by speakers of the language. In my self-guided research, I focus on the sound quality of the consonants and their variations to determine underlying pronunciation. I also connect these variations to historical sound changes from Middle Chinese, its ancestor, into Sanmen Wu. I observe that Sanmen Wu speakers tend to freely alter pronunciations of certain consonants. For example, a speaker may say 部 [pu] or [bu] meaning ‘part,’ the latter only appearing after another spoken word. These two syllables contrast only in voicing, where [p] is voiceless and [b] is voiced. I use Praat, an industry-standard speech-analysis program, to read diagrams that depict the acoustics of these consonants to verify my findings. I am also creating a set of rules that predicts this alternation. One of the conditions is as follows: words with alternating voicing in their consonants change when pronounced within a sentence (‘medially’). Eventually, I will explain these rules, and I predict my explanation is related to the evolution of Sanmen Wu into its current stage. I reason that because the Wu language family stems from Middle Chinese, both of which require contrastive voicing to create distinct words, Sanmen Wu also contains the original underlying variation that exists in Middle Chinese. As such, I attribute this variation to an inherent part of the language rather than random circumstance. Ultimately, I intend to foster a thorough understanding of Sanmen Wu phonology and provide a foundation for further exploration of this topic.

Panãra is a Jê language spoken in the Panará Indigenous Land in the Brazilian Amazon by around 730 people. I am an undergraduate research assistant working as part of the larger Panãra Documentation Team at the University of Washington. I am in the process of transcribing, coding, and archiving field notes taken by team members during the summer of 2024. I have employed my experience with Panãra and Portuguese to resolve ambiguities in the notes and to code materials in a standardized, accessible manner. Many letters, such as ⟨b, d, g, z, l⟩, and sequences, such as ⟨-ät-⟩ or ⟨-me-⟩ are impossible due to Panãra’s phonology and orthography. However, these letters may occur in the notes due to transcriber error or Portuguese loans. When I identified suspect items, I had to use my knowledge of Panãra to determine their status. I typed the notes into text format before transferring items into a spreadsheet. In the spreadsheet, I coded part of speech and added lexical items to the ongoing dictionary. My work is a case study in longer-term, multi-researcher documentary efforts in linguistics. Not only will the body of data I code be valuable in further analysis of the language, but the processes developed will be useful in rethinking how documentary linguistics is carried out. In particular I emphasize the need for a coherent vision of data usage, from collection to coding. As the dictionary work moves forward, my next steps will be to give words that have not yet been checked in the field to the research team for the summer and to code the phonological, orthographic, and lexical information for each word into the FLEx database.