Overgeneral Autobiographical Memory (OGM) is a common symptom of depression and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Instead of remembering specific details, individuals with OGM can only describe past events from their lives in general terms. The "trauma hypothesis" suggests that OGM emerges because individuals suffering from PTSD tend to reduce the number of details they retrieve about their memories to avoid remembering their trauma. However, this hypothesis does not fully explain how this avoidance is learned, or why avoidance spreads from traumatic memories to all autobiographical memories. To this end, we propose a computational model of OGM that integrates theories of memory retrieval and trauma with reinforcement learning. In this model, multiple episodic memories are nodes in an interconnected network, and memories are retrieved when visiting that node in the network. The more nodes that are visited, the more detailed that autobiographical recall will be. On the other hand, visiting more nodes comes with an increased risk of encountering a traumatic memory, which comes with negative emotional valence. The decisions about whether to visit another node or terminate the retrieval process are made using reinforcement learning, which takes actions based on predicted outcomes. By obtaining a greater understanding of OGM through this model, we hope to improve treatments for PTSD that specifically targets its effects on memory. 

Autism is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by social-communication differences and restricted, repetitive behaviors (American Psychological Association, 2013). While racial disparities in autism prevalence have been documented, not much research has examined how these differences appear in autism screening measures. This study investigates racial differences in Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) scores among non-autistic Asian and White adults to assess potential biases in autism screening. Using data from three NIH-funded studies (COBRA, BEAM, and The Korean Study), AQ scores from 166 participants (n=102 White, n=64 Asian) will be analyzed through t-tests and Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to compare total and subscale scores. Preliminary observation suggests that non-autistic Asian participants may be more likely to score higher on the AQ, raising concerns about false positives in autism screenings. Understanding these differences will help improve diagnostic accuracy, reduce disparities, and promote equitable access to neurodevelopmental resources.

How do we move beyond basic aid to truly support the mental well-being of displaced communities? Jordan, a growing nation in the Middle East, is globally recognized as a leading host for refugees. During my five-week Fall 2023 internship at the Institute for Family Health (IFH) in Jordan, I conducted a research project exploring how mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) programs address the needs of refugees and vulnerable populations, to fulfill requirements of my program on Psychology, Mental Health, and Well-being in Conflict-Affected Contexts. I employed participatory observation, analysis of material culture, and formal interviews to gather data. At IFH, I worked in both clinical and administrative settings, gaining firsthand insight into a healthcare model that prioritizes accessibility by ensuring high-quality mental health services regardless of wealth or citizenship status. I examined IFH’s use of the Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) intervention pyramid, which balances specialized and community-based care to bridge gaps in mental health services. Through my research, I found that the most common mental health complaints are anxiety, depression, and PTSD. To address these complaints effectively, my research suggests that transformative care requires a holistic approach to MHPSS programs—integrating mental health practices, promoting illness prevention, building strong community bonds, and empowering future generations. This experience reshaped my understanding of global mental health challenges and led me to explore key questions, such as how organizations can expand MHPSS programs to meet growing demand and what role cultural and systemic factors play in shaping mental health interventions. My findings suggest that expanding MHPSS programs requires both increased resources and culturally responsive strategies. By sharing insights from Jordan, I aim to highlight scalable approaches and contribute to ongoing conversations about sustainable mental health interventions for displaced populations.

Eating disorders increase the risk of co-occurring mental illnesses, such as depression and anxiety. Asian Americans are an underrepresented population in eating pathology research; they may be under or misdiagnosed and often do not seek services because interventions do not align with their culturally specific needs. The existing literature often neglects the impact of acculturation and acculturative stress on disease presentation and etiology. Acculturative stress arises from balancing the dominant culture's values with one's culture of origin, leading to psychological distress and disordered eating as a coping mechanism. Acculturation, the process of culture change, can increase the pressure to conform to Western thin beauty standards. People who ruminate may be particularly at risk for using disordered eating as a maladaptive coping mechanism against stress. Examining the critical roles of acculturation, bicultural stress, and rumination as unique and interactive determinants of eating pathology can lead to culturally relevant knowledge about its etiology and enhance utility and effectiveness of interventions. This study is aimed to examine acculturation orientations and bicultural stress as predictors of eating pathology symptoms, and rumination as a moderator. We hypothesize that higher levels of acculturative stress will be linked to greater eating pathology symptoms, over and above acculturation orientations. Rumination—particularly brooding—is expected to exacerbate the association between eating pathology symptoms and acculturative stress. Data are from the baseline measurement occasion of an existing longitudinal survey study that examined associations among mental health, personal and sociocultural risk and protective factors. Asian American undergraduate students (N=313; Mage=19.89; 72.5% U.S.-born; 55.6% female and 32.9% male) completed the baseline survey. With the anticipated support of the Mary Gates Scholarship, we will complete hierarchical regression analyses to test the hypotheses. Regression coefficients and effect sizes, model statistics, and p-values will be reported. 

Asian Americans are victims of anti-Asian racism, but recent studies have also shown that they have a different role in perpetuating anti-Blackness and White supremacy. Our research aimed to specifically examine whether White and Asian Americans perceive a difference between anti-Blackness and White supremacy. We ran a qualitative study where anti-Blackness and White supremacy were defined for Asian and White American participants, who were then asked to write about their racial group’s relationship with those phenomena. We defined anti-Blackness as the belief that Black people are inherently inferior to others, and the corresponding practice of them being given insufficient power. Similarly, we defined White supremacy as the belief that White people are inherently superior to others and the corresponding practice of them being given disproportionate power. A few research assistants and I rated the similarity between the responses on anti-Blackness and White supremacy on a Likert scale from 1 to 7, with 1 indicating “not similar at all,” and 7 indicating “very similar.” We then performed a two-sample t-test (a type of statistical data analysis in psychological research) on this data to compare the responses between the Asian and White American participants. As expected, we found that the Asian American participants rated anti-Blackness and White supremacy as being more distinct than the White Americans did. The p-value for this data analysis was a statistically significant 0.004. These findings establish a foundation for future studies on the Asian American role in anti-Blackness and White supremacy. I have also conducted data analysis and ran participants for two such studies, which examined whether reminders of anti-Blackness caused Asian Americans to take more responsibility for anti-Blackness and show more solidarity with African Americans more than reminders of White supremacy.

First-generation college students (FGCS), those first in their families to pursue or complete a college degree, are a widely studied demographic across psychological research. However, much of the literature on FGCS examines their mental health and life experiences through a deficit framework, focused on systemic obstacles to success and categorizing students as “at risk”. Additionally, some research fails to recognize the importance of intersectionality, viewing FGCS’s mental health as separate from its systemic, social, and institutional contexts. To better highlight the assets and intersecting identities of FGCS, this strengths-based presentation explores existing literature about their mental health experiences, describes their risk and protective factors in developing mental health symptoms and conditions, and proposes mental health initiatives for FGCS and, specifically for, Latine FGCS. I use insights from interviews with Latine FGCS as illustrative examples to further demonstrate the importance of considering context and intersectionality in this area of psychological research.